Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Come on, John Ensign...you're not trying!

The latest hilarious story of a politician with a roving willy is that of Nevada Republican senator John Ensign, who has shamefacedly confessed to an extramarital affair. Like the disgraced Democratic New York governor Eliot Spitzer, Ensign is your garden variety moral hypocrite, with an extra special twist that makes the schadenfreude at his downfall especially delightful. Because, being a Republican, Ensign's big bugaboo was the "threat" of gay marriage, and how it threatened to "weaken" traditional marriages like the one he was betraying. Among other things, Ensign was very vocal in his calling for Larry "Wide Stance" Craig to resign. Here's Ensign on marriage catching teh gay.

“The effort to pass a constitutional amendment reaffirming marriage as being between a man and a woman only is being undertaken strictly as a defense of marriage against the attempt to redefine it and, in the process, weaken it,” Ensign said. “Marriage is an extremely important institution in this country and protecting it is, in my mind, worth the extraordinary step of amending our constitution.” [Emphasis added.]

Seems to me Ensign isn't spinning this with the kind of gusto one expects from the right. I mean, hasn't it occurred to him that he could parlay his philandering ways into proof of his anti-gay marriage thesis?

Clearly, what happened was that, when all these rainbow-flag waving liberals and spearchucking lesbians began demanding marriage equality, Ensign's marriage was so "weakened," that he just couldn't stop himself from having an extramarital affair! If only gay marriage hadn't become a political hot button topic, the marriages of healthy straight Christians like John Ensign, Ted Haggard, Jimmy Swaggart, and so very many others, would have been as towering in their strength as a Himalayan peak! Right. Right? So what more proof do you people need that we must stand unwavering against the threat of gay marriage, lest more heterosexuals fall victim to the monogamy-dampening effects of their gay rays.

What...you're saying no one would buy it? Well, no, they wouldn't, except for the inmates over at WorldNutDaily and the Christian Worldview Network. But my point is, heck, he could have at least tried, you know. Jeez, even Bill Clinton had the stones to come up with such artistically inventive rhetorical interpretive dance as "That depends on what the definition of 'is' is." So come on, Sen. Ensign, step up! Haven't we earned the right to expect at least that from our politicians?

6 comments:

  1. Roy Zimmerman:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bja2ttzGOFM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aqu_dvVe0Pg

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know this isn't exactly topical, but I thought I would point this out and I wasn't sure where to leave this other than here. The itunes release of the newest episode has about 7 minutes of dead air in the beginning of the episode. I don't know if it is missing time at the end or not, but it seems based on the length it probably will be missing those minutes. Just thought you should know.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, a better place to send that info would have been to the TV show address, but thanks. We now return you to your regularly scheduled comments.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm sorry but with a name like Ensign, I just keep seeing Dr. Macoy going up to his political carrier, shaking his head and saying "It's dead, Jim".

    ReplyDelete
  5. I can't help but love the fact that he apparently met the woman he had the affair with through her husband, who he met as a fellow member of Promise Keepers. The irony here is just too rich.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Promise Keepers?

    IS that like Secret Keeper? Did one of them betray the other to Lord Voldemort? Can they blame this on the The Imperius Curse?

    ReplyDelete

PLEASE NOTE: The Atheist Experience has moved to a new location, and this blog is now closed to comments. To participate in future discussions, please visit http://www.freethoughtblogs.com/axp.

This blog encourages believers who disagree with us to comment. However, anonymous comments are disallowed to weed out cowardly flamers who hide behind anonymity. Commenters will only be banned when they've demonstrated they're nothing more than trolls whose behavior is intentionally offensive to the blog's readership.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.